appoint:phd:pbc_rog
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
appoint:phd:pbc_rog [2026/02/04 15:03] avink |
appoint:phd:pbc_rog [2026/02/04 15:07] (current) avink |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| **PBC interviews in later years:**\\ | **PBC interviews in later years:**\\ | ||
| - | After the first year the PBC evaluates the progress of each PhD student once a year, based on a written progress report submitted by each candidate. The progress report must be written using a template which will be supplied by email. It is expected that this report be discussed with the supervisors prior to submitting it. The completed form must be uploaded in the database https://jobs.strw.leidenuniv.nl/2025/pbc at least two working days prior to the interview. During the interview the PBC will first discuss progress with the PhD student (20 minutes), without the presence of the supervisors, and will then speak with the supervisors, without the presence of the PhD student. The PBC will provide feedback in the form of a report, which will be sent to the candidate and the supervisors. This report may contain recommendations concerning the project, which must be discussed by the PhD student and the supervisors. The PBC report needs to be saved in the personnel file. | + | After the first year the PBC evaluates the progress of each PhD student once a year, based on a **written progress report submitted by each candidate**. The progress report must be written using a template which will be supplied by email. It is expected that this report **be discussed with the supervisors prior to submitting it**. The completed form must be uploaded in the database https://jobs.strw.leidenuniv.nl/2026/pbc at least 1 week prior to the interview. During the interview the PBC will first discuss progress with the PhD student (20 minutes), without the presence of the supervisors, and will then speak with the supervisors, without the presence of the PhD student. The PBC will provide feedback in the form of a report, which will be sent to the candidate and the supervisors. This report may contain recommendations concerning the project, which must be discussed by the PhD student and the supervisors. The PBC report needs to be saved in the personnel file. |
| **Contact: Alina Vink, secretariat STRW avink@strw.leidenuniv.nl**\\ | **Contact: Alina Vink, secretariat STRW avink@strw.leidenuniv.nl**\\ | ||
| **Other roles of the PBC:**\\ | **Other roles of the PBC:**\\ | ||
| - | 1) it is possible to schedule an appointment with the PBC any time of the year (in these cases no report is written), should the candidate (or supervisors) want advice on any aspect of the project. Just contact one of the PBC chairs for this. | + | 1) it is possible to schedule an appointment with the PBC **any time of the year** (in these cases no report is written), should the candidate (or supervisors) want advice on any aspect of the project. Just contact one of the PBC chairs for this. |
| - | 2) sometimes the PBC will want to schedule an additional progress meeting outside the annual cycle. | + | 2) sometimes the PBC will want to schedule an **additional progress meeting** outside the annual cycle. |
| - | 3) the PBC also plays an advisory role in connection with contract extension requests. Such requests (which must be made by the supervisors to the Scientific Director) must always be accompanied by a detailed schedule leading to a completed thesis at the end of the requested extension period. | + | 3) the PBC also plays an advisory role in connection with **contract extension requests**. Such requests (which must be made by the supervisors to the Scientific Director) must always be accompanied by a detailed schedule leading to a completed thesis at the end of the requested extension period. |
| The PBC assesses the feasibility of the proposed schedule, and reports its assessment to the Scientific Director, who decides on the request. | The PBC assesses the feasibility of the proposed schedule, and reports its assessment to the Scientific Director, who decides on the request. | ||
| - | 4) the non-scientific parts of the PhD thesis (see official PhD regulations for more information on this) require formal approval by the PBC. This can be done by email, through one of the PBC chairs. | + | 4) the **non-scientific parts of the PhD thesis** (see official PhD regulations for more information on this) require formal **approval** by the PBC. This can be done by email, through one of the PBC chairs. |
appoint/phd/pbc_rog.1770217409.txt.gz · Last modified: 2026/02/04 15:03 by avink
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: GNU Free Documentation License 1.3
